![]() ![]() eine Hochzeit fotografiert hat und 2.0003.000 Fotos durchsehen will, kann es in. ![]() ![]() Leider ist es in Sachen Performance nicht immer optimal. I appreciate that not all RAW engines are the same, but the images I'm getting a considerably less saturated and contain considerably less contrast than those coming from other applications (including FastRawViewer). Lightroom ist ein tolles Programm um seine Fotos zu verwalten und auch zu bearbeiten. Some of it is cross platform and inexpensive - FastRawViewer at 14.99 some is more expensive PhotoMechanic or Imatch but there’s no real barrier to purchase. Should I not be using it?Īlong the same lines, if I do use that method, I'm curious what configuration options I should set to get an image that is visually similar to those produces by other RAW engines. A PhotoLab photographer - unless s/he can stand 5 second waits between switching images - really needs to be using ingestion software to create selects. I don't intend to do any RAW processing myself so I'm relying on this method to produce an image that can be displayed to the user. "The function is intended solely for demonstration and testing purposes it is assumed that its source code will be used in most real applications as the reference material concerning the order of RAW data processing." It's working great, but I'm a bit confused by the documentation for: I'm using LibRaw in a macOS application for quickly showing thumbnails to a user of RAW files that aren't natively supported by macOS. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |